![]() Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource. ![]() There, we can see information of the signer and the signature etc.Īnother nice thing if digitally signed, is that if submitted to VirusTotal, then on the analysis, under the File Detail, it shows nicely a green icon and the signature information: The digital signing of all those files, can be confirmed, by right clicking those files, and selecting the tab: Digital Signatures. A I forgot the others that get installed in the AppData subfolders.) (And actually I see now that there are not so many files there, just 4, and then the files in the subfolder: translations. To check for integrity and authenticity, the signature file hence the file with the ending. So, if installed in the default location, C:\Program Files\qBittorrent, then by going to that folder, all the files would be digitally signed. I dont know exactly the specifics, but I think that after the installer is signed, when downloaded and installed in the PC, then all the files included in the installer, are digitally signed too. When we see the SHA-1 Checksum, we smile.īut there is another thing, that you could do, which would bring ever bigger smiles. Does one pay 120k€ for an attack if it can’t deliver results? But I exclude this from my doubts list above, because I have no actual data on webseed usage and I can imagine a rare scenario in which someone would spent even more for a chance of getting access to a few machines.I have to admit, that in the websites downloads page: The torrent file offers a selection of webseeds, so the attack is not very effective against users with webseed-capable clients. Why did the attacker spent money on producing at least two different versions of the same ISO if one would be enough? Do we?īy pure coincidence a day earlier I was downloading that ISO through torrent perhaps a dozen times. I am new to using qBittorrent, and couldnt find the answer to this question in the FAQ section. ![]() No one spends such amount of money to attack a random account2, so we should be observing a widespread, ongoing attack. That implies spending at least 120k€ on the attack. I would rather believe that malware is already on account2’s computer and is modifying ISOs, if I have to assume foul play. Unless an actual report about the attack can be produced. I doubt that and find a kernel or hardware issue a more plauible explanation. Maybe qBittorrent is corrupting the downloads? Or maybe hardware issue? : o Gpg: There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner. Gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature! Gpg: Good signature from "Pierre Schmitz " ![]() => ERROR: The signature identified by archlinux-2020.07.01-x86_64.iso.sig could not be verified. Gpg: BAD signature from "Pierre Schmitz " $ gpg -keyserver-options auto-key-retrieve -verify archlinux-2020.07.01-x86_64.iso.sig
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |